Drafting Tenets
While business leaders don't need to be lawyers, but they must be able to recognize the hallmarks of a precise agreement. The following four pillars provide a framework for building contracts that are clear, defensible, and aligned with your business objectives.
Define Your Terms with Surgical Precision. The foundation of any contract is its definitions. Vague or undefined core terms are an invitation to litigation. Define every mission-critical term as if it will be deliberately misinterpreted. Spell out what is included and, just as importantly, what is excluded.
Incorporate External Documents Correctly. Contracts often refer to other documents, like statements of work, exhibits, or schedules. If these documents contain material obligations and conditions, then ensure that they are properly incorporated. To incorporate by reference a document that is legally binding, it must be explicitly named, referenced with specificity, and ideally physically attached as an exhibit. Vague references to titles or provisions are legally worthless and contain no legal force.
Specify Procedural Mechanics. The "how" and "when" of a contract are just as important as the "what." Procedural steps are not suggestions; they are binding obligations. For any critical right or obligation—such as termination, renewal, or exercising an option—clearly define the exact procedural triggers, timelines, and notice requirements. The absence of a required step can invalidate the right entirely.
Scrutinize "Boilerplate" Language. Standard, or "boilerplate," provisions like releases and integration clauses are often overlooked, but they carry immense legal weight. Under the canon of interpretation known as ejusdem generis, the surrounding clauses of a clause/term in dispute may govern the scope and limit of a particular term. If a clause is meant to be global, ensure it is not surrounded by and therefore limited by narrower provisions.
Contract Checklist
This checklist provides a set of critical questions for business leaders to discuss with their legal counsel, ensuring that the agreement is as airtight as possible. Think of this as the final quality control check before a product goes to market.
Are all key terms clearly defined?
Does your agreement clearly define its most critical concepts, leaving no room for subjective interpretation?
What are the exact triggers for key rights and obligations?
What specific events, dates, or actions trigger important clauses in your contract, such as payment, termination, or performance deadlines?
Are there any conflicting provisions or documents?
Have you read the entire document and all attachments to ensure there are no internal contradictions?
If other documents are mentioned, are they properly incorporated?
If your agreement relies on an exhibit, schedule, or other document, is it properly named, referenced, and attached?
How is performance measured and what discretion is allowed?
For agreements involving performance-based outcomes, clarity is paramount.
Are the metrics for success objective and measurable?
Does the agreement specify the level of discretion the board or management has in determining whether milestones have been met?
Vague terms like 'best efforts' or subjective milestones create ambiguity which can be problematic as it relates to performance metrics and board discretion. Without it, you grant the other party the unilateral power to determine if you’ve met your obligations, leaving you exposed. Asking these questions forces a level of scrutiny that uncovers ambiguity before it can become a liability.
If you’ve got questions, we’ve got answers.

